There is a significant difference between British and German Nazi standards that needs to be clarified.  As everyone knows, German Nazi standards were developed in Nazi Germany.  Ironically, Adolf Hitler himself did not meet German Nazi standards, and is technically not related to the von Bismarck line because of this.  German Nazi standards only apply to the white race, must have a large percentage of German descent and are dependent on one being genetically EXACTLY who they say they are, usually through very thorough DNA testing.  The Nazis strove to achieve this standard through breeding, in reality once one ancestor lost German Nazi standards through unnatural behaviors or breeding, they are impossible to regain.  Both biological parents must meet German Nazi standards for any resulting biological offspring to also meet German Nazi standards.  For this reason, the Nazis incorporated breeding programs often in vain, when it was often more practicable to salvage DNA from those already meeting German Nazi standards, rather than try to breed it into those people who do not already meet German Nazi standards.  German Nazi standards are very societal in that the Germans felt that the master Aryan race must be preserved, so that there would be variety on the planet, including pure, natural white.  Although very white, German Nazi standards do not necessarily always focus on hair color or eye color, although this is preferred.  One either meets German Nazi standards or does not, and steps are often taken to disguise growth and appearance in placing and hiding surrogates.  No one can help who they are genetically, and the harassment being a surrogate can be extreme, particularly since German Nazi standards do not take into account what side of WWII one’s ancestors fought on and many surrogates do not know their true identities and cannot defend themselves.  Extremely rare, German Nazi standards might be similar to qualifying for the endangered species list with everyone else coming over to the zoo to harass, steal from and lie about the (often Allied descendant) victim.  Picking on German Nazi standards makes everyone else feel whiter and straighter today!!!  Don’t you feel justified in your lousy actions in picking on a ROOSEVELT!

The actual descendants of Axis veterans very rarely qualify for German Nazi standards and have no designation for themselves.  The British monarchy, being genetically Jewish, hated Nazi Germany so much it came up with its own British Nazi standards.  British Nazi standards are only dependent on what side of WWII one’s ancestors fought on (Allied only), not their genetic makeup.  One third of America is of German descent and more German-Americans entered the U.S. military in support of the Allies than ALL of the Canadian military.  Despite this, the harassment from the British has been so extreme that German-Americans repeatedly have suffered unprovoked attacks from the United Kingdom, since through no fault of their ownm the German-Americans can sometimes count that they meet both British and German Nazi standards, such as myself. 

Since the only reason British Nazi standards were developed was to save European monarchies from being exposed as genetically Jewish, you can find discrepancies in its definition.  One may take a paternity or maternity test (or grand-paternity or grand-maternity test) and determine where their immediate ancestors were in WWII and in what side they fought on, since they have to either be in an Allied country, Allied military, or neutral country to qualify.  Infants, housewives, factory workers, and invalids are usually included in British Nazi standards, as long as they meet residency or incapacity requirements.  If someone meets German Nazi standards, but is a descendant of Axis veterans, they do not qualify for British Nazi standards.  Remember, that although British Nazi standards are based on a DNA test, they do not verify actual military service, a veteran’s association would do that separately.

Since no one can help their ancestry, passing an ancestral DNA test for Allied service or residence does not indicate loyalty or subservience to Britain, and certainly did not in WWII, when most countries went to war with Germany because Germany declared war on them, not to save the British or Jews.  British Nazi standards were developed in the 1960s with this definition and are quite common throughout the world.  Some of the possibly unexpected candidates meeting this standard include African-Americans, Belgians, Dutch, French, Native Americans, the entire Soviet Union (Poland, Russia, Ukraine, and etc.) and too many other countries and ethnicities to list.  Unlike German Nazi standards, British Nazi standards do not exclude candidates based on ethnicity, race or religion.  Most of the people I have talked to both in America and in the former Soviet Union, are not willing to give up their qualifications as meeting British Nazi standards or share them with other non-Allied groups, contrary to rumors otherwise.  I do not see why the British monarchy cannot include these, since the British refuse to stay on their own territory anyway.  Some Jewish people may qualify for British Nazi standards, some may not, depending upon whether they are descendants of Axis or how much they cooperated with the Axis.  Ultimately, the British Nazi standard, unlike the German Nazi standard, is too loosely defined not to have a lot of fun personally researching.

Most European royal titles are copyrighted, and Wessex was copyrighted in the 1950s by my biological family.  A royal copyright prevents anyone else, including Sophie Rhys-Jones and ‘Count’ Edward from using the name or insinuating they are at all related to me, when they are not.  Royal copyrights do not depend on British and German Nazi standards, religion or nationality to be enforceable.  Although all ‘officially’ recognized titles by countries are usually copyrighted, a royal copyright does not allow one to have their title recognized by a country in and of itself, and I have no need for this.  When tracking royalty, one must track how many people are in line to receive claim on a royal copyright, and I am first on Wessex.  However, European thrones are tracked by the order of their royal copyrights, not the people in line to receive a specific royal copyright, and the Wessex royal copyright is supposed to be 999th to the British throne.  The United Kingdom has no right to illegally recognize Wessex because it was copyrighted by my biological family first.   The United Kingdom must immediately cease and desist on illegally recognizing Wessex.

Dorothy Susan von Bismarck (formerly Sophia Dorothea Roosevelt)

“Hammer and Nails (1977) by Hans Godo Frabel.  A "glass hammer" is a highly impractical object which an apprentice might be sent to fetch as part of a fool's errand” (Fool’s Errand, 2021, p. 1).

References

Wikipedia.org.  (2021).  Fool’s Errand.  Wikipedia.org.  Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fool%27s_errand